Wednesday, December 16, 2009

"do you think of others? like yourself?"

in regard to the title of this entry: i wrote as ambiguously as i often speak to allow for a certain plurality in my message. it's asking a few different questions; the one to which you respond says a little about your perspective.

first, almost directly, it asks, if you consider other people (in your thoughts and actions). then, it asks if you like yourself. i hope the answer to each is a thoughtless "yes." reading the message this way reveals a more objective perspective/mindset.

a little more subjectively, it asks if you think of others like you - be that in terms of vocation, ethnicity, mentality, or whathaveyou. basically, do you consider the like-minded, and what connects you - makes you and your type what you are? a quintessential question for anyone passionate about a skill/trade/art, especially considering drive, muse, and what precedents have been set in your area of practice. consider the other; revolutionize your field, especially by inspiring those not quite as developed as you.

lastly, it suggests a side-by-side analysis of how you see. it does this by asking if you consider others as you would yourself. do you acknowledge the existence of a situational/external locus of control for others, as you would yourself? for example, when you are late, you can blame the weather, traffic, roommate issues, a faulty alarm clock, or a previous class on the other side of campus consistently releasing you late. however, when you see that classmate come in late all the time, do you blame the student for being lazy, or do you ponder why before pointing an accusatory finger? similarly, can you be as hard on yourself as you are on others? can you admit that you should have just studied more, tried harder, or actually cared?

the last two perspectives remind me of a quote i once read: "When you come across a superior person, think of being equal to him. When you come across an inferior person, turn inwards and examine yourself." consider those like you and inspire them to consider you. and when you look at others, utilize the variety of vantage points your mind and experiences provide. i feel, if we all do these things, there'll be a lot more understanding and a lot less hatred.

think. consider the other. like yourself.
and to quote one whom i believe will be a great future parent, "hey - quit fuckin up! "



pretty much another way to look at the concept of just thinking for a moment and considering another vantage point. think little. makes a big difference.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Hegemony

Glossed with sweat, my body gently heaved in time with the quickened-though-disturbingly-natural pace of my breathing. As I surveyed my work, knocking a few limbs farther back into the brush, a contented smirk wormed its way across my face.

“Easier’n I thought,” I scoffed.

And it was. Invigorating, too.

Initially, my movements were constrictively precise – a quality borne of my usual line of work that I’d have to shrug off. But after a single demonstrative stroke by my superior, it was if I was born for the job. And how beautiful it all was! Free-flowing, rhythmic strokes easily freed limbs and chunks of their flesh, many of which fell at my feet like complimentary roses thrown before a ballet dancer. A few chunks careened into my chest and arms, but I didn’t mind. On the contrary! – my body hungered for further exhibitions of my utter dominance – continued acclaim for my beautiful performance.

It was all despicably good. I was like a child with his first Red Ryder BB gun, but instead, I wielded a common motorized hedge cutter. It purred like a dream as its blade tore seamlessly through the damned before me – unless I cut against the grain. Then, it roared like finely tuned American muscle. Either way, my ears were treated to a symphony of delightful deconstruction.

I glanced over at my superior to admire his strokes. (Mmmm, how electric must be the rush of doing this with a sling blade!) I thought. The light pull of resistance stemming from manually cleaving through the wretched creatures… I relished the power and knew no equal ecstasy.

Job done, I lusted for more, but knew it best not to overindulge my first time. As we headed back, I proudly wore the splattered badges of my conquest, not daring to wipe off any of it.

Pleasure aside, it was back to business. Once inside, I made my way back to my quarters, where the little lady gave me a glass of my favorite on the rocks, knowing well enough to leave the bottle right next to it. After washing down the delectable decadence, I turned on the computer to check my inbox for the rest of the day’s schedule. 9:54am – finished “hedging the weeds.”

Before I could access the mail server, an article on my home page caught my eye: “US-NKorean Nuke Race: Armoring up or evening the playing field?”

“Heh,” I scoffed. “That’s an easy one: depends on what soil you’re on.”

There’s a fine line between ready and not; man enough and not. Surprisingly, it was my superior who believed me adept, as the only pittance of trust in anyone he’d shown since I wound up here was placed in me; as evinced by his entreating me to both the mission and that devastating instrument with which I carried it out – flawlessly, I might add.

Heh, but he didn’t see what I did.

Peering into the workings of my heart – well, where it’s supposed to be – I know better.

They say it takes a big man to admit when he’s wrong – when he’s just not up to assume full responsibility for the task at hand. Guess I’m still growing. Heh, fuck it – no blood lost, right? Well, none of mine.


I wrote this after assisting my father edge up the forest line behind our house. While engaged, I did seriously assess the exhilaration of destruction. It being a while since my last father-son landscaping activity, I’d forgotten how dangerously powerful machines can be. Initially, I feared my strokes would end up taking a chunk out of my leg. As I familiarized myself with the weight and pull of the machine, my form grew more confident. Soon, I was unnecessarily eradicating all traces of trunks already virtually unnoticeable. I would grant no branch or stem amnesty.

I admit I went mad with power, like a kid in a candy store with a questionably assigned credit card. Realizing this, I began to fear continued indulgence and what it might do to my otherwise mild-mannered temperament.

But that was nothing.

What really shook me was the acknowledgment that, too often, this struggle pervades the conscious minds of men, inducing them to become slaves to the perverse – the carnal, and (perhaps) primal – without even knowing. Worse still, is when we willingly submit to the allure of power without even batting an eye.

Before you say “that’s not me,” think for a second. You tell your dog to “sit” and you forcibly make him comply. Or you simply hit it for taking its time to comply. Nothing, right? Some may disagree. But I won’t. However, I will once your hits grow progressively stronger, or if your body temperature rises with your increasing anger. Or you twist your mouth in perturbed insistence you be feared/followed. Now replace “dog” with “child,” or “video game,” or even “hair.”

We’re obsessed with control. I once read a quote holding anger is our response to lack of control. We’ve a high need for control in this existence where we’re each only about 0.000[0’s near ad infinitum]1% of the whole picture. We’re each (hopefully) fully aware that the world will keep spinning just the same with us gone. Other galaxies’ comets won’t adjust their orbital patterns one bit on account of any one of us being happy, sad, or angry. Yet when we feel we’re losing control in an existence where we’ve already a miniscule amount, we freak. We cling to any we can assume. And very often, we are only assuming it.

Owning a gun is a controversial issue regarding self-defense. Many feel safer having one. It gives them a sense of control and power in case of emergency. However, many feel it does the same even when there isn’t an emergency. So what happens would innocents at home, seeking control via firearm, clash with those employing firearms to ensure control and power in the form of wealth? A showdown ensues where the victor is the one with either the most gun or situational control. Thus, the struggle for power and control continues, possibly more intensely than ever before.

Nuclear arms = same theme, drastically more frightening/destructive plot. One side arms itself to protect against another party doing the same. Fear = response to lack of control. Fear drives one nation’s leaders to do what they criticize another nation’s leaders for doing. Each side calls itself righteous, obviously either blind to the quest for control’s hold over them, or embracing it and riding the wave of control’s high. And who’s going to argue when it’s said to be done in the name of the nation – of reducing fear and keeping control in the hands of “just?” Interestingly enough, only certain people are justified in dubbing others as “just.” Guess who they are. I’ll give you a hint: those already in control of your opinion and nation. Justification of the “just” is just another exercise of their control.

Now think: if those people whose fingers are already bound tight around the trigger of the gun holding the apocalyptic bullet are blind to the pull of control and dominance, or they willingly indulge themselves on it, that means they’re likely to share the same mindset as my fictitious narrator: they know they’re holding a loaded gun – aimed at us all – and not even willing to put down the gun. They either don’t know their trigger fingers are twitching, or love the thrill of staring down oblivion and knowing its onset is under their command.

It’s scary. It’s sick. It’s happening.

Query: when the heat is on, do you have what it takes – not only to realize your lust for power/control, but – to cast off its shackles, giving the situational reins to someone (then) more capable?

Something to think about.

Friday, April 10, 2009

kararavich

my cue to shine...



[7:48:57 PM] [Raeed] says:
whenever i'm a little less ballsy/gutsy than i'd like, i return to two simple concepts:

[7:53:37 PM] [Raeed] says:
1) a key factor in the Mahayana vehicle of Buddhism, impermanence. we worry so much about time and try to make everything permanent, when we know it's not. nothing is. live in each moment fully, and prepare for the next. [his] interest in last night's boob show will pass, probably within minutes - days for certain. your unemployment will pass. you've quite the impressive resumé. it may be hard, but that's what makes you tougher and more appreciative, so relish it even when the chips are down. and when they're up, it'll take you ever so much higher. and as for believing in yourself, realize what you do will have effects indicating what you might call right or wrong. ultimately, it's what you do with them and the effects after, and the effects after those ad infinitum that matter. there's no cut off point. no one saying "pencils down." life's an essay you write until (and maybe after) you no body left to leave a mark. treat it as such

[8:00:18 PM] [Raeed] says:
2) the indomitability of the human spirit. from creation, humans don't stop fighting. we hold our breath until we pass out, we involuntarily start breathing again once our conscious is out of the way. from birth, we form everything we need for survival in the womb. once we're out, we already, instinctively, know how to suckle. we get food that way and survive. from there, we begin absorbing every influence around us to learn how better and longer to survive. we've reflexes for when that learning doesn't have time to reach our conscious minds (ducking and covering your head when you hear a gunshot or bomb; retracting a hand from a hot stove). in short, everything about us is geared - not only to endure, but - to prevail. thus, when your spirit feels heavy and weak, know you're continued existence is your involuntary/subconscious jumpstart: you're still alive, thus you're body's not done. so neither are you. you may not be "right" right now, but you can always work to right the near infinite later-ons. don't let fear of wrong petrify you. let it guide you to more intelligent responses. this test ain't over yet - not  by a longshot



one-two, my friends

Saturday, February 14, 2009

"Do you have the courage to acknowledge yourself and stand up for what's in there?" ~Evan Tanner

http://messageboard.tuckermax.com/showthread.php?t=4380

this topic gets the ol' gears a workin, grinding against the harsh reality of my own contentedness and for how long i've embraced it with open arms. only recently have i started to branch out more and do more things which i felt truly emotionally and experiencially sating.

on that same board, there is a thread about "the best compliment you've ever received." one guy shared this: two guys talking as I was packing up after a show: "[suapyg] plays the drums like the police are waiting for him outside." "No, [suapyg] LIVES HIS LIFE like the police are waiting for him outside."
merely reading that fed the fizzling spark within me, inducing a flicker reflecting the potential of a roaring inferno. occasionally, i lose sight of the warmth and tenacity of that potential, but ultimately, i know it's there. and i will honor it.

i swear it.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

evolutionary process

i post this as an outlet for my utter disgust over the passing of proposition 8 in the lovely state of California. for those who do not know, this successful passing of this proposition means the overturning of California's previous lifting of the ban on same-sex marriage. for those uninterested, good day.

for the rest, here are some quotes from Margaret Cho's I Have Chosen to Stay and Fight which, i believe, beautifully articulate her (and, incidentally, my own) stance on same-sex marriage:

----"
if we are not absolutely insistent, unflinching, strident about lifting the ban on same-sex marriage, then we might as well forfeit the Constitution, cross out all the Amendments, knock down the Statue of Liberty (it was a gift from France anyway - those peace lovers: who needs 'em?), reverse Roe v. Wade, pretende Stonewall never happened, reinstate Prohibition, deny women the vote, derail the Underground Railroad, bring back slavery, retrieve all the tea bags from Boston Harbor (actually, let them steep - gay marriage is still legal in Massachusetts, for now), give Patrick Henry death instead of liberty (he's fucking dead now, anyway), get back on the Mayflower and go back to England. the only problem would be, trying to bring the Native Americans back to life and restore their nations that we so cavalierly destroyed in our own pursuit of religious 'freedom.'
without the reality of same-sex marriage, there is no freedom. this is not an argument about homosexuality, or God, or what is in the bible, or what your moral value system is or what you feel is ethical. it is a no-argument zone. no spins here, not in the least. it is about upholding the idea that America is the representation of freedom in the world. that to be an American is to be free. unless we have same-sex marriage recognized and legalized by every state, then we are not free. we are hypocrites, for we are according freedoms to a certain group in our population while denying those same rights to others. it is discrimination, and that is that.
"

----"why do i work intensely for the queer community -- protest, demonstrate, enduring being called a hypocrite, not give a shit and keep going like the Engergizer Bunny?Because love is love. Love is love. Love is love. Love is love. Mother-fucker."

----"i have paintings in my bedroom, painted by a man i love more than anyone, a gay man, who depicted the death, the unfathomable loss, the cost of AIDS, and homophobia and hatred, the most expensive cruelty, the debt that will never be repaid, the pain stretched out on canvas for all to see, the unbelievable tragedy he endured during the '70s and '80s that he couldnt'even talk about, he could only paint it, because if you put words to it, that beat will fuck you up, and you will never dance again. i sleep underneath these works of art, beautiful not only because they are true, they are also born from grief that radiates fresh and hard from them even a quarter of a century later. they are the first things i see when i wake, the last thing i see before i got to sleep. i will never forget what unjust acts i witnessed as a child, against men and women who chose to be themselves. who chose to love. who loved. who fucking loved. their blood remains indelible, and even though it is not my own fucking personal blood i still feel the pain of the cut. and it hurts. nobody will know how much it hurts me. a lot. that is all i can say."



in the recent presidential election, my vote went to the platform which, among other things, supported equality in terms of those engaging in civil unions. of course, this was not the sole deciding factor, it was one of those in the forefront of my mind through my deliberations. and, while civil unions are not marriages, the platform i supported attested to ensure all the same rights which married people are entitled were to be also granted to those having civil unions. baby steps. i fervently believe this is a small step in the way of wading in the waters of freedom - the freedom of which our forefathers wrote and dreamed in saying "we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal." separate but equal hasn't worked before, and it won't work now, especially when separates =/= equal. despite opposing moral convictions and religious affiliations, we are a nation. thus, we should act like one. one unit. comprised of many. thus, no single doctrine borne of a particular background can rightly govern those who take refuge underneath the communal flag. no one religion has the right, in a country founded by those who sought to indulge in religious freedom, to usurp all convictions of self-evident civil liberties. you live here, you check your nooses and pitchforks on the shore. you can be who you are, as long as who you are isn't persecutor of those who are not you. as Margaret Cho says, this is not a religious or moral issue. it is a fact.
you can't show up to a party that advocates freedom for all/all men are created equal and instate a moral dress code for everyone to get you voted most popular. that's when we go Carrie on you and slaughter you in the wake of your own false kingdom.
just saying. take that how you will.

note, in the previous paragraph, i continued to say "platform" when speaking of where went my vote. i didn't say "candidate." i didn't say "party." parties and candidates are figureheads. or, to get communication class on you, heuristic cues - shortcuts, if you will, which allow one to "[react] automatically to a usually informative trigger feature... [which] preserves crucial time, energy, and mental capacity" (Robert. B Cialdiani, Influence: Science and Practice, 17). we use terms like "Democrat" and "Republican" to reduce the time and energy we'd expend describing the stereotyped positions most people adhering to those titles generally hold. what i consider myself is irrelevant. as is the person at the forefront of the platform i support. if you're truly interested, do as i and look into the platforms behind the candidates.
anywho, i did this not to hide my beliefs and vote; i'll gladly discuss them with anyone curious enough to ask. however, i wanted to specifically serve as a sharp foil to those who are bandwagon jumpers. whether it's race, political affiliation, or whathaveyou. if one trigger decided your vote - if you voted to keep a black man out of office or put one in; if you voted republican/democratic because your family does or doesn't; if you voted for anything as petty as that, i almost want to tell you never to vote again. unless you'll change your ways, or your vote helps elect the candiate with the plan which ultimately betters this nation, don't play with the state of the nation like that. it's irresponsible. really.

one of the biggest problems today is not thinking enough or at all. Alfred North Whitehead once said, "Civilization advances by extending the number of operations we can perform without thinking about them." i believe that's true. the so-called "developed nations" are the ones with the biggest rulebooks and shiniest toys. virtually independent areas thriving under their own civil authority governed by what's right, who secure enough food for themselves and their livestock each day, who bleed blood and not money, and who entertain themselves with each other and not things are seen as primitives. we call their lack of name brand clothing sad and blame it on their being impoverished. when really, they just wear enough to keep warm and cover themselves because think more practically and less lavishly. how many people know how to repair an engine these days? how many just take it to a shop when something goes awry and get a rental car until the old's working fine again? we have warning lights in our cars which tell us when to take it to get serviced. we've developed online systems to help us get rental cars faster, but don't use the internet to figure out how to take care of our own cars.

let's get off the heuristic cues and start taking the central processing route sometimes. who knows where we'll end up. better than sitting in the backseat constantly inquiring "are we there, yet?" or even "where are we going?" stop thinking none or thinking too big. think little; think practical. think real.
but don't stop there! act! that goes for everything. start small to build up your drive. learn how to take care of something yourself. then build up. research and get involved in politics. we're not all going to be political leaders, but, as we've seen with the petition for Proposition 8 and the passing of it, concerned citizens getting involved can make just as much a difference as a figurehead in the White House. a presidential election is not a magic wand which will grant its wielder anything his or her heart desires. we've a system of checks and balances. and while the scales may seem to tip in a certain direction here or there, the president still has to pass things through the legislative branch. and, some things, won't be federally decided. if you look up what a candidate's platform is, you can see some issues will be left up to states to determine. there's still power with the people. use it.

yeah, voting's one thing. regardless if "your candidate" was elected, fight for what you believe. ever been to a rally? ever signed a petition? ever organized a group for discussion? for speaking to/with others to share your thoughts and garner support? ever write your congressmen? if you've done none of those things, you're sitting in the backseat annoying those at the wheel. voting's a start, but it's not enough. put up or shut up. and don't be discouraged. as one of my favorite quotes heralds, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." (Margaret Mead)


one-two, my friends.

Thursday, August 7, 2008

feed the family

Oh, warrior of light,
adorned with tattoos of shared blood,
throw down your harms;
throw out your arms and stay the fleeting Love,
ceding to the shadows
nothing

~Kyle Uriel Oslo, The War



everyone read Margaret Cho's I Have Chosen to Stay and Fight.
i've got way too much on my mind right now. it's been an enlightening summer, to say the least.

fight a war worth fighting, geniuses.

i've only just begun. take care.

Monday, July 21, 2008

"sleep time is over, story time is now!"

following this introduction are two short pieces which i feel might fit into a romantic short story. comments and criticism welcome, as always. oh, and note, the first will be found in the second, but i wrote the first one before the second, yet found it could also fit within the second. not wishing to deprive it of it's individual potency, i chose to present it first, then allow you to see how it fits in with the second composition. enjoy. or disdain. whichever.

1)
thinking about seeing you again - it's exhilarating. when you get off work, i'm just around back, vibing to our number one station, accompanied by the mental percussion of each second bringing you closer to me, and the steps of your feet treading the cool, wet asphalt paving your way to me.
you toss your bag in the bed as you open the cabin door, smiling.
"hey, you"
overcome with a light smile of my own, "hey. you hungry?"
with a light shaking of your head, you close the door. "nah, we'll eat at my place."
we pull out into the night, making our way to what's to be the final destination of the night - stopping at your dining table to detour for pre-couch movie-to-slumber nourishment



2)

“No –”I begin, lightly blocking her hand from disheveling my hair, much to my own dismay, knowing well the bliss borne of her hands upon my receptive flesh. Answering the question her eyes began to beg, I continue, almost smirking as I press the tip of my nose into her inner cheekbone, noses grazing as it passes.
“I want to look my best for you tomorrow night at dinner; I really do. But, because I know you’ve been patient, after dinner, we’ll have some together time which’ll make it worth the wait:

Me, the pressed businessman closing a deal at a top-notch restaurant on my last night on the road; you, the chef looking to impress. You insist I stay for dessert – your specialty. But, with a long drive ahead come morning, I respectfully decline, making my way to the door. You cut me off. With one hand on the breast of my suit jacket, you make your final plea. I catch your eyes for the first time. They don’t let go. I find I’ve agreed to take you up on your offer. Under your spell, I begin to make a move back for my table, but your hand proves and impassible barrier. Gaze never torn from your own, I notice their subtle direction. ‘It’s almost closing. Give me twenty– thirty minutes.’ I believe I manage to eke out a nod.

Thinking about seeing you again - it's exhilarating. when you get off work, i'm just around back, vibing to the radio’s song, accompanied by the mental percussion of each second bringing you closer to me, and the steps of your feet treading the cool, wet asphalt paving your way to me.
you toss your bag in the bed as you open the cabin door, smiling.
‘hey, you.’
overcome with a light smile of my own, ‘Hey. So, where to?’
with a light shaking of your head, you close the door. ‘We'll eat at my place.’
we pull out into the night, making our way to what's to be the final destination of the night - stopping at your dining table to detour for pre-couch movie-to-slumber nourishment”





take care.